Team extension

Hire engineers who join your team

Not an agency handoff. Our engineers work on your board, in your standups, under your tech lead — and you own everything they write from day one.

What hiring through Yarvixo actually means

The terms, before the pitch.

You get senior and mid+ engineers only — there is no junior bench being billed at senior rates, because there is no junior bench. They work CET and US Eastern hours, join your existing process rather than importing ours, and you hold 100% of the IP from day one. An NDA is signed before anything is shared.

Billed per engineer per month, not per hour and not per ticket. The minimum useful engagement is three months: below that, onboarding eats most of the value and both sides know it. A typical team is two to eight engineers plus a tech lead, with a QA engineer if the work needs one. We can start within 1–2 weeks of signing.

Roles we staff

Five, not fifty. Every one of them is backed by a client sector or a published case study — a role we cannot evidence is a role we should not be selling.

How the engagement works

Six steps from a role brief to an engineer on your board.

Define the role

The stack, the seniority, and what the first month has to produce. That last part is the one most role briefs leave out, and it is the one that makes a shortlist useful.

Meet the engineers

You interview, against your bar and your process. If we do not have the right person for the role we say so rather than putting forward the nearest one — a bad match costs you a quarter.

Contract and NDA

An NDA before any of your code or design material is shared. You hold 100% of the IP from day one. Work can start within 1–2 weeks of signing.

Onboard into your process

Your board, your repo, your standups, your review conventions. The target for week one is a small change landed in your pipeline, not an architecture proposal.

Run it monthly

Billed per engineer per month, $4,000–$7,000 by seniority and from $4,000. Three months minimum, then rolling — below three months onboarding eats most of the value and both sides know it.

Scale or stop

Add engineers as the work grows, or end it with notice. A team of two to eight plus a tech lead is the usual shape, with a QA engineer when the work needs one.

Outstaffing or managed delivery?

The honest case for each, including when the answer is neither.

Take the engineers

Right when you have product direction in-house and the gap is capacity. You own the backlog, the priorities and the definition of done; we supply people who can land changes in your pipeline. Billed per engineer per month.

Take the outcome

Right when you have a defined result and would rather buy it than manage a team. Managed delivery is quoted fixed-price after a discovery call, and the scope does not move unless you move it.

Take neither, for now

If the scope is genuinely still moving, a fixed price buys you change requests instead of software; if nobody can prioritise, added capacity drifts. Sometimes the right answer is to settle the direction first, and we would rather say that on the call.

Common questions

The three that come up on nearly every first call about this role.

Managed delivery means we own the outcome against a fixed price and a fixed scope — right when you have a defined result and would rather buy it than manage a team. Outstaffing means you own the direction and we supply the capacity: our engineers, your backlog, your process, billed monthly. The deciding question is not cost, it is who is going to prioritise the work. If nobody on your side has time to do that, added capacity drifts and drift is expensive at senior rates.
Three months. Below that, onboarding consumes most of the value on both sides: an engineer spends the first weeks learning your codebase and conventions, and you spend them reviewing work from someone who does not yet know either. After three months it is rolling, and you can scale the team up or end it with notice.
You do, from the first commit — 100% of the IP and copyright, in the contract, with no licence-back and no shared-ownership clause. An NDA is signed before any of your code, designs or data are shared with anyone on our side.
CET and US Eastern. That is a deliberate constraint rather than a coincidence: it means there is real overlap with teams in Europe and on the US east coast, and partial overlap with the west coast. If your team is in Asia-Pacific the overlap is poor and we will say so rather than promise asynchronous heroics.

Need a specific stack?

Tell us the role, the stack and when you need someone on the board. We will come back with who we can put on it and what it costs, in writing.

Message received

We’ll review your enquiry and respond within one business day.